6EQ2

MTH1 in complex with fragment 6


Experimental Data Snapshot

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.80 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.209 
  • R-Value Work: 0.170 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.172 

wwPDB Validation   3D Report Full Report


Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


This is version 1.4 of the entry. See complete history


Literature

Ligand retargeting by binding site analogy.

Wiedmer, L.Scharer, C.Spiliotopoulos, D.Hurzeler, M.Sledz, P.Caflisch, A.

(2019) Eur J Med Chem 175: 107-113

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2019.04.037
  • Primary Citation of Related Structures:  
    6EQ2, 6EQ3, 6EQ4, 6EQ5, 6EQ6, 6EQ7

  • PubMed Abstract: 

    The DNA-repair enzyme MutT homolog 1 (MTH1) is a potential target for a broad range of tumors. Its substrate binding site features a non-catalytical pair of aspartic acids which resembles the catalytic dyad of aspartic proteases. We hypothesized that inhibitors of the latter might be re-targeted for MTH1 despite the two enzyme classes having different substrates and catalyze different reactions. We selected from the crystal structures of holo aspartic proteases a library of nearly 350 inhibitors for in silico screening. Three fragment hits were identified by docking and scoring according to a force field-based energy with continuum dielectric solvation. These fragments showed good ligand efficiency in a colorimetric assay (MW <300 Da and IC 50 <50μM). Molecular dynamics simulations were carried out for determining the most favorable interaction patterns. On the basis of the simulation results we evaluated in vitro seven commercially available compounds, two of which showed submicromolar potency for MTH1. To obtain definitive evidence of the predicted binding modes we solved the crystal structures of five of the 10 inhibitors predicted in silico. The final step of hit optimization was guided by protein crystallography and involved the synthesis of a single compound, the lead 11, which shows nanomolar affinity for MTH1 in two orthogonal binding assays, and selectivity higher than 2000-fold against its original target (BACE1). The high rate of fragment-hit identification and the fast optimization suggest that ligand retargeting by binding site analogy is an efficient strategy for drug design.


  • Organizational Affiliation

    Department of Biochemistry, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057, Zurich, Switzerland.


Macromolecules
Find similar proteins by:  (by identity cutoff)  |  3D Structure
Entity ID: 1
MoleculeChains Sequence LengthOrganismDetailsImage
7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine triphosphatase182Homo sapiensMutation(s): 0 
Gene Names: NUDT1MTH1
EC: 3.6.1.55 (PDB Primary Data), 3.6.1.56 (PDB Primary Data), 3.6.1 (UniProt)
UniProt & NIH Common Fund Data Resources
Find proteins for P36639 (Homo sapiens)
Explore P36639 
Go to UniProtKB:  P36639
PHAROS:  P36639
GTEx:  ENSG00000106268 
Entity Groups  
Sequence Clusters30% Identity50% Identity70% Identity90% Identity95% Identity100% Identity
UniProt GroupP36639
Sequence Annotations
Expand
  • Reference Sequence
Small Molecules
Ligands 1 Unique
IDChains Name / Formula / InChI Key2D Diagram3D Interactions
BU8 (Subject of Investigation/LOI)
Query on BU8

Download Ideal Coordinates CCD File 
B [auth A]1~{H}-imidazo[4,5-b]pyridin-2-amine
C6 H6 N4
KXQPVJRJUJJWQJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N
Binding Affinity Annotations 
IDSourceBinding Affinity
BU8 BindingDB:  6EQ2 Kd: 1300 (nM) from 1 assay(s)
IC50: 1100 (nM) from 1 assay(s)
Experimental Data & Validation

Experimental Data

  • Method: X-RAY DIFFRACTION
  • Resolution: 1.80 Å
  • R-Value Free: 0.209 
  • R-Value Work: 0.170 
  • R-Value Observed: 0.172 
  • Space Group: P 21 21 2
Unit Cell:
Length ( Å )Angle ( ˚ )
a = 60.406α = 90
b = 66.314β = 90
c = 36.138γ = 90
Software Package:
Software NamePurpose
PHENIXrefinement
XDSdata reduction
PHASERphasing

Structure Validation

View Full Validation Report



Ligand Structure Quality Assessment 


Entry History & Funding Information

Deposition Data


Funding OrganizationLocationGrant Number
University of ZurichSwitzerlandFK-16-032

Revision History  (Full details and data files)

  • Version 1.0: 2018-10-31
    Type: Initial release
  • Version 1.1: 2019-05-15
    Changes: Data collection, Database references
  • Version 1.2: 2019-05-22
    Changes: Data collection, Database references
  • Version 1.3: 2019-08-14
    Changes: Data collection
  • Version 1.4: 2024-05-08
    Changes: Data collection, Database references